The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
ERA I 3, 272 (19) | 71 % |
|
ERA II 31, 116 (6) | 62 % |
|
E 64454 (5) | 59 % |
|
ERA II 29, 218 (a) | 54 % |
|
ERA II 29, 218 (b) | 54 % |
|
ERA II 35, 45 (3) | 52 % |
|
E 63990 (7) | 48 % |
|
E 54757 (6) | 45 % |
|
E 72983 (46) | 44 % |
|
ERA II 183, 497 (47) | 44 % |
|
ERA II 213, 517 (105) | 43 % |
|
E, StK 30, 29 (17) | 42 % |
|
E, StK 30, 88 (5) | 42 % |
|
ERA II 196, 546 (48) | 41 % |
|
E 73924 (47) | 41 % |
|
H II 36, 388 (14) | 37 % |
|
E 61855 (10) | 34 % |
|
H II 36, 388 (13) | 32 % |
|
ERA II 253, 420 (16) | 32 % |
|
H III 27, 77 (3) | 30 % |
|
H II 49, 1024 | 30 % |
|
ERA II 250, 546 (23) | 28 % |
|
ERA II 82, 41 (13) | 27 % |
|
EÜS VII 2018 (237) | 26 % |
|
E 66316 (110) | 26 % |
|
H II 59, 807 (81) | 25 % |
|
H II 30, 757 (10) | 23 % |
|
H II 53, 19 (3) | 22 % |
|
ERA II 84, 392 (23) | 22 % |
|
EKmS 4° 2, 547 (2) | 22 % |
|
EKmS 4° 2, 613 (2) | 22 % |
|