The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
EKmS 4° 2, 512 (15) | 31 % |
|
E 85078 (15) | 29 % |
|
H II 2, 117 (195) | 27 % |
|
H II 49, 292/3 (58) | 25 % |
|
H II 49, 248 (14) | 25 % |
|
EKS 50, 70/1 (58) | 25 % |
|
EKS 50, 17/8 (14) | 24 % |
|
ERA II 210, 528/9 (3) | 23 % |
|
H II 20, 364/5 (4) | 23 % |
|
ERM 14, 22/3 | 22 % |
|
H II 17, 415 (10) | 17 % |
|
H II 2, 104 (159) | 17 % |
|
E 51856/7 (8) | 17 % |
|
E, StK 5, 34/6 (6 (l)) | 16 % |
|
E A 6/7 (8) | 16 % |
|
E 53375/8 (2) | 16 % |
|
E 59462/4 (4) | 15 % |
|
E 44773 (13) | 14 % |
|
H II 38, 746/7 (11) | 13 % |
|
H II 35, 428 (255) | 13 % |
|
H II 35, 422/3 (251) | 12 % |
|
EKmS 4° 1, 613/4 (5) | 12 % |
|
EÜS IV 1987/90 (31) | 11 % |
|
EÜS I 1031 (23) | 11 % |
|
E, StK 19, 87/8 (76) | 11 % |
|
TEM 13, 12 (7) | 11 % |
|
EÜS IX 465 (86) | 10 % |
|
H, R 4, 78 (2) | 10 % |
|
ERA I 4, 555 (5) | 10 % |
|
H III 30, 304/6 | 10 % |
|
H II 1, 116 (159) | 10 % |
|
H II 2, 16 (29) | 10 % |
|
H I 1, 205 (45) | 10 % |
|