The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
H, Peet 101 (110) | 40 % |
|
EÜS VII 145 (27) | 38 % |
|
H II 43, 93/4 (110) | 31 % |
|
EÜS VII 164 (51) | 29 % |
|
H II 26, 261 (13) | 28 % |
|
H III 28, 363 (1) | 27 % |
|
H III 7, 188/9 (9) | 23 % |
|
EÜS V 1550 (35) | 22 % |
|
Veske 1, 93 (43) | 22 % |
|
EKmS 8° 1, 737/8 (13) | 21 % |
|
H II 26, 301/2 (17) | 21 % |
|
EÜS V 658 (91) | 20 % |
|
H, R 6, 727/8 (13) | 20 % |
|
ERA II 112, 758 (127) | 20 % |
|
E 12926/7 (22) | 19 % |
|
ERA I 5, 50 (5) | 19 % |
|
ERA II 261, 40 (27) | 19 % |
|
E A 643 (14) | 18 % |
|
E A 906 (3) | 17 % |
|
E 50614/5 (12) | 17 % |
|
E 39676 (13) | 16 % |
|
H II 19, 583 (4) | 15 % |
|
H II 26, 838 (1) | 15 % |
|
H III 2, 456/7 (61) | 15 % |
|
H, Gr. Qu. 362 (15) | 15 % |
|
EÜS VII 446 (245) | 15 % |
|
H III 12, 509 (1) | 15 % |
|
Leoke 5, 97/8 (3) | 15 % |
|
H II 42, 675 (39) | 14 % |
|
E, StK 17, 147 (84) | 14 % |
|
ERA II 141, 134/5 (128) | 14 % |
|
H II 20, 74 (5) | 13 % |
|
ERA II 177, 363 (10) | 12 % |
|
E, StK 13, 9 (14) | 12 % |
|
H III 14, 583/4 (4) | 12 % |
|
EÜS VIII 1631 (152) | 11 % |
|
E 8022 (1) | 11 % |
|
Leoke 1, 87/90 (9) | 11 % |
|
H II 23, 417 (2) | 10 % |
|
ERA II 3, 640/1 (10) | 10 % |
|
H II 26, 666/7 (2) | 10 % |
|