The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
| E A 357 (3) | 86 % |
|
| EÜS X 1488/9 (41) | 69 % |
|
| H IV 1, 131 (73) | 44 % |
|
| H III 2, 176/7 (9) | 33 % |
|
| H I 2, 685 (8) | 31 % |
|
| H I 5, 52 (95) | 29 % |
|
| EÜS X 800 (81) | 25 % |
|
| H II 14, 18/9 (22) | 17 % |
|
| H III 7, 40/2 (6) | 16 % |
|
| H II 27, 693/4 (1) | 16 % |
|
| EKmS 4° 1, 415/6 (18) | 15 % |
|
| EKmS 4° 1, 64 (87) | 15 % |
|
| EÜS V 791/2 (36) | 15 % |
|
| H I 4, 80 (56) | 15 % |
|
| H III 23, 96/7 (82) | 14 % |
|
| H II 58, 795 (38) | 13 % |
|
| ERA II 210, 539 (13) | 13 % |
|
| H III 8, 16 (9) | 13 % |
|
| EKmS 8° 3, 588/91 (7) | 13 % |
|
| H II 10, 317/8 (36) | 12 % |
|
| ERA II 116, 401/3 (20) | 12 % |
|
| E 35987/8 (31) | 11 % |
|
| H II 9, 775 (46) | 11 % |
|
| H, Gr. Qu. 187 (80) | 11 % |
|
| E 14787 (14) | 11 % |
|
| EÜS X 1954 (170) | 10 % |
|
| E A 361 (8) | 10 % |
|
| EÜS VII 1715 (310) | 10 % |
|
| H IV 1, 475 (8) | 10 % |
|
| EÜS X 646/8 (100) | 10 % |
|
| H II 38, 705 (101) | 10 % |
|
| H II 13, 491/3 (7) | 10 % |
|
| E 15864 (4) | 10 % |
|