The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
| H II 59, 6 (25) | 82 % |
|
| E 12549 (8) | 77 % |
|
| E 24459 | 76 % |
|
| E 75452/3 | 74 % |
|
| EÜS VI 771 (35) | 70 % |
|
| H IV 8, 793/4 (4) | 67 % |
|
| E 19618 (462) | 57 % |
|
| ERA II 124, 518 (1) | 53 % |
|
| ERA II 63, 47 (73) | 52 % |
|
| Leoke 3, 83 (158) | 52 % |
|
| H II 31, 484/5 (10) | 51 % |
|
| E 8° IX 78/9 (288) | 50 % |
|
| E 64474 (5) | 50 % |
|
| H II 29, 298 (2) | 49 % |
|
| EÜS IX 168 (3) | 49 % |
|
| E 28606/7 (21) | 48 % |
|
| Leoke 3, 284 (6) | 43 % |
|
| ERA II 285, 293 (123) | 43 % |
|
| E 31309/10 (1) | 42 % |
|
| Leoke 1, 301 | 40 % |
|
| ERA II 16, 518 (5) | 39 % |
|
| Veske 5, 138 | 38 % |
|
| ERA II 124, 92 (15) | 37 % |
|
| H II 25, 474 (112) | 35 % |
|
| ERA II 134, 39/41 (4) | 35 % |
|
| H III 8, 220 (6) | 32 % |
|
| E 8633 (1) | 31 % |
|
| H III 14, 329 (1) | 30 % |
|
| H III 27, 136 (8) | 27 % |
|
| H III 10, 110/1 (17) | 24 % |
|
| E 48656 | 24 % |
|
| H II 26, 848 (1) | 22 % |
|
| H II 29, 351/2 (2) | 20 % |
|
| E 17237 (?) | 19 % |
|
| E 41995 | 11 % |
|
| E 8269 (5) | 10 % |
|