The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
| H II 30, 763 (1) | 77 % |
|
| H II 30, 764 (3) | 76 % |
|
| H II 30, 699 (11) | 68 % |
|
| EKmS 8° 2, 51 (2) | 57 % |
|
| ERM 31, 5 (1) | 57 % |
|
| H II 30, 701 (13) | 56 % |
|
| EKmS 8° 2, 50 (1) | 53 % |
|
| H II 30, 700 (12) | 52 % |
|
| H IV 4, 638 (51) | 51 % |
|
| EKmS 8° 2, 51 (3) | 51 % |
|
| H II 31, 913 (7) | 46 % |
|
| H II 31, 375 (2) | 42 % |
|
| ERM 21, 49 | 41 % |
|
| H II 31, 375 (3) | 40 % |
|
| ERA II 298, 356 (8) | 38 % |
|
| ERM 21, 12 (14) | 38 % |
|
| ERM 22, 12 | 38 % |
|
| H II 31, 375 (1) | 37 % |
|
| ERM 22, 22/3 | 34 % |
|
| H IV 4, 630 (24) | 34 % |
|
| ERM 21, 39 (60) | 34 % |
|
| ERA II 299, 553/5 (23) | 28 % |
|
| H I 5, 505 (2) | 26 % |
|
| H, Jõgever 2, 118 (704) | 23 % |
|
| ERA II 63, 365 (54) | 22 % |
|
| ERM 9, 4a (1) | 22 % |
|
| H II 30, 248 (1) | 19 % |
|
| H IV 4, 455 (1) | 18 % |
|
| EÜS VII 57 (10) | 18 % |
|
| H IV 1, 353 (6) | 18 % |
|
| E 39274/5 (e) | 17 % |
|
| E 39274 (d) | 17 % |
|
| H IV 4, 456 (2) | 17 % |
|
| H III 16, 245/8 (1) | 14 % |
|
| H, Wiedemann 3, 88 (10) | 14 % |
|
| H II 30, 354 (1) | 14 % |
|
| E 8° IX 28 (76) | 14 % |
|
| H II 58, 658 (4) | 13 % |
|
| H IV 4, 864 (2) | 13 % |
|
| H II 24, 233 (271) | 13 % |
|
| ERA II 3, 181 (27) | 12 % |
|
| ERA II 250, 201/2 | 11 % |
|
| H II 71, 158 (8) | 11 % |
|
| ERA II 193, 604 (20) | 11 % |
|