The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
| ERA II 186, 326 (3) | 30 % |
|
| ERA II 11, 225 (1) | 22 % |
|
| ERA II 180, 109 (22) | 21 % |
|
| H II 31, 817 (1) | 21 % |
|
| H IV 3, 597 (23) | 21 % |
|
| H III 25, 301 (10) | 21 % |
|
| H II 25, 678 (8) | 21 % |
|
| ERA II 16, 519 (8) | 18 % |
|
| H II 44, 616 (54) | 17 % |
|
| EÜS IX 325/6 (84) | 16 % |
|
| H II 71, 541 (26) | 16 % |
|
| H, Põlva 1, 43/4 (16) | 15 % |
|
| H II 30, 43 (10) | 15 % |
|
| E 8870/1 (84) | 14 % |
|
| EÜS XII 575 (115) | 14 % |
|
| H II 54, 625 (2) | 14 % |
|
| ERA II 141, 309 (7) | 13 % |
|
| H, Peet 250 (254) | 13 % |
|
| E 66087/8 (21) | 13 % |
|
| E, StK 17, 130 (54) | 13 % |
|
| H II 71, 688 (10) | 12 % |
|
| E 18067 (9) | 12 % |
|
| H IV 4, 140 (2) | 11 % |
|
| H III 7, 170 (9) | 11 % |
|
| Leoke 3, 245 | 11 % |
|
| EKmS 4° 5, 901 | 11 % |
|
| Veske 4, 309 (24) | 11 % |
|
| E 29868/9 (3) | 11 % |
|
| Leoke 1, 31 (12) | 11 % |
|
| E 40750 | 10 % |
|
| E 6653 (2) | 10 % |
|
| H II 41, 728 (6) | 10 % |
|
| H III 7, 951/2 (7) | 10 % |
|
| H, Mapp 717 (4) | 10 % |
|
| ERA II 126, 216 (1) | 10 % |
|
| H II 30, 209/10 (25) | 10 % |
|
| H III 7, 129 (14) | 10 % |
|
| EÜS VIII 1394/5 (100) | 10 % |
|
| H II 30, 398 (9) | 10 % |
|