The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
H II 30, 69/70 (16) | 25 % |
|
ERM 59, 7 (7) | 25 % |
|
H II 44, 631/2 (96) | 22 % |
|
E 54111 (15) | 20 % |
|
ERA II 78, 59/61 (1) | 19 % |
|
H II 44, 603/4 (12) | 17 % |
|
ERA II 186, 459/61 (9) | 16 % |
|
H I 2, 516 (12) | 16 % |
|
H II 30, 556, 559 (2) | 16 % |
|
E 17271/2 (8) | 15 % |
|
H II 25, 170/1 (44) | 15 % |
|
H IV 3, 897/8 (15) | 15 % |
|
H II 28, 380 (12) | 14 % |
|
H II 6, 774/5 (105) | 14 % |
|
EÜS V 1083/4 (54) | 12 % |
|
H II 56, 664/6 (8) | 12 % |
|
H II 43, 25/8 (19) | 12 % |
|
ERA II 198, 408/9 (4) | 12 % |
|
H I 9, 529/30 (80) | 11 % |
|
H II 44, 623/4 (75) | 11 % |
|
EKmS 8° 2, 248/50 (25) | 11 % |
|
Leoke 3, 236 | 11 % |
|
E 56030 (48) | 11 % |
|
EKmS 4° 5, 485 (453) | 10 % |
|
H, Põlva 2, 18/21 (23) | 10 % |
|
Leoke 3, 154 (20) | 10 % |
|
E 56500/3 | 10 % |
|
Veske 2, 291/2 | 10 % |
|
H II 24, 415 (193) | 10 % |
|
H I 7, 619/20 (7) | 10 % |
|