The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
EÜS VI 1424/6 (89) | 49 % |
|
H I 1, 158/9 (43) | 30 % |
|
H II 65, 337/8 (11) | 24 % |
|
H II 11, 271/2 (33) | 24 % |
|
E 7170/1 (31) | 23 % |
|
H II 65, 279 (14) | 23 % |
|
H II 12, 370/1 (169) | 22 % |
|
H IV 6, 532 (8) | 21 % |
|
H II 13, 532/4 (39) | 20 % |
|
EÜS IX 350 (120) | 19 % |
|
H II 38, 140 (36) | 15 % |
|
H IV 5, 636/7 (24) | 15 % |
|
EÜS VI 1540/1 (288) | 15 % |
|
H II 13, 643 (19) | 14 % |
|
H II 1, 276 (408) | 13 % |
|
H II 16, 127/8 (161) | 13 % |
|
H III 3, 484/5 (19) | 13 % |
|
EKmS 8° 2, 459/60 (22) | 13 % |
|
E, StK 13, 36 (47) | 13 % |
|
H II 15, 409/10 (48) | 13 % |
|
E 14034 (26) | 13 % |
|
H II 58, 467/8 (3) | 12 % |
|
H II 10, 59/60 (49) | 12 % |
|
EÜS IX 844 (7) | 12 % |
|
H II 16, 240 (1) | 12 % |
|
E 54043 (10) | 12 % |
|
EKLA, f. 47, m. 28: 25, l. 5/13 | 12 % |
|
H II 50, 201/2 (8) | 12 % |
|
H I 7, 107 (24) | 11 % |
|
H II 9, 359 (37) | 11 % |
|
EKmS 4° 5, 853/4 (18) | 11 % |
|
ERA II 24, 175/6 (11) | 11 % |
|
H II 37, 20 (12) | 11 % |
|
H II 38, 178 (12) | 10 % |
|
H II 65, 144 (13) | 10 % |
|
EKS 47, 21 (27) | 10 % |
|
H II 17, 44 (28) | 10 % |
|
H III 18, 445 (1) | 10 % |
|
H II 24, 829 (5) | 10 % |
|
EÜS X 1847/8 (4) | 10 % |
|