The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
| EÜS X 2577 (40) | 57 % |
|
| E 59772 (3) | 42 % |
|
| E 7701/2 (14) | 34 % |
|
| H II 57, 204/5 (7) | 31 % |
|
| ERA II 123, 288/9 (55) | 29 % |
|
| EÜS IV 1795 (295) | 25 % |
|
| H III 8, 75 (12) | 25 % |
|
| H III 3, 70/1 (3) | 25 % |
|
| H II 59, 512 (74) | 25 % |
|
| H II 26, 582/3 (4) | 24 % |
|
| H I 2, 287 (20) | 24 % |
|
| H II 16, 166/7 (212) | 24 % |
|
| H IV 3, 559/63 (1) | 24 % |
|
| EÜS IV 1796 (296) | 22 % |
|
| H II 43, 780 (10) | 21 % |
|
| ERA II 214, 710 (7) | 20 % |
|
| H IV 3, 742/3 (7) | 19 % |
|
| E, StK 18, 110 (84) | 19 % |
|
| H II 49, 625/7 (3) | 17 % |
|
| ERA II 86, 107 (83) | 16 % |
|
| Leoke 3, 191 (27) | 16 % |
|
| EÜS II 531/2 (33) | 15 % |
|
| E 85280/1 (4) | 14 % |
|
| E 85951 (2) | 14 % |
|
| E 82675/7 (2) | 13 % |
|
| EKmS 4° 2, 36 (15) | 12 % |
|
| EÜS II 663/4 (158) | 12 % |
|
| EÜS VIII 1590 (90) | 12 % |
|
| ERM 144, 49/50 (60) | 12 % |
|
| EÜS II 60/1 (31) | 11 % |
|
| H II 66, 593/6 (112) | 11 % |
|
| H, Kolga-Jaani 2, 186/7 (113) | 10 % |
|
| EÜS X 300/1 (3) | 10 % |
|