The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
| ERM 31, 5 (1) | 58 % |
|
| H II 30, 699 (11) | 56 % |
|
| H II 30, 701 (13) | 56 % |
|
| H II 30, 700 (12) | 53 % |
|
| H II 30, 763 (1) | 53 % |
|
| H II 30, 764 (3) | 52 % |
|
| ERM 21, 12 (14) | 52 % |
|
| H II 30, 763 (2) | 51 % |
|
| H II 31, 375 (3) | 50 % |
|
| EKmS 8° 2, 50 (1) | 47 % |
|
| H II 31, 913 (7) | 45 % |
|
| H II 31, 375 (2) | 45 % |
|
| EKmS 8° 2, 51 (2) | 44 % |
|
| H II 31, 375 (1) | 44 % |
|
| ERA II 298, 356 (8) | 40 % |
|
| ERM 21, 39 (60) | 40 % |
|
| EKmS 8° 2, 51 (3) | 37 % |
|
| ERM 22, 22/3 | 37 % |
|
| ERA II 299, 553/5 (23) | 32 % |
|
| ERM 21, 49 | 30 % |
|
| ERM 22, 12 | 29 % |
|
| H II 30, 248 (1) | 28 % |
|
| EÜS VII 57 (10) | 27 % |
|
| H IV 4, 630 (24) | 27 % |
|
| H I 5, 505 (2) | 24 % |
|
| ERM 9, 4a (1) | 24 % |
|
| H, Wiedemann 3, 88 (10) | 23 % |
|
| H, Jõgever 2, 118 (704) | 19 % |
|
| H IV 1, 353 (6) | 17 % |
|
| H, Wiedemann 1, 230 | 16 % |
|
| E 39274/5 (e) | 16 % |
|
| H II 43, 201 (3) | 16 % |
|
| H III 16, 245/8 (1) | 16 % |
|
| H II 30, 354 (1) | 15 % |
|
| JR 77398 | 14 % |
|
| H II 62, 683/4 (37) | 13 % |
|
| H II 24, 233 (271) | 12 % |
|
| ERA II 186, 402 (132) | 12 % |
|
| ERA II 250, 201/2 | 11 % |
|
| JR 41489 | 10 % |
|