The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
| EKmS 4° 2, 352 (63) | 83 % |
|
| E, StK 5, 65/6 (2) | 75 % |
|
| E 16830 (19) | 68 % |
|
| H II 19, 855 (9) | 67 % |
|
| H II 10, 339 (63) | 56 % |
|
| E A 395/6 (1) | 53 % |
|
| H III 2, 297 (14) | 45 % |
|
| H II 41, 823/4 (1) | 43 % |
|
| H III 31, 411/2 (30) | 42 % |
|
| E 11607 (10) | 36 % |
|
| ERA II 279, 170 (9) | 35 % |
|
| H III 11, 101/2 (4) | 34 % |
|
| H IV 3, 606 (31) | 33 % |
|
| EÜS VII 76/7 (3) | 33 % |
|
| H III 18, 665/6 | 31 % |
|
| E 8926 (7) | 29 % |
|
| H I 4, 801 (2) | 27 % |
|
| ERA II 146, 125/6 (9) | 26 % |
|
| H III 19, 273 (7) | 25 % |
|
| ERA I 4, 314 (4) | 24 % |
|
| EÜS IV 2032/3 (63) | 19 % |
|
| ERA II 5, 337 (15) | 19 % |
|
| H III 9, 162 (6) | 18 % |
|
| E 43598/600 (24) | 17 % |
|
| H, Mapp 245/7 (25) | 17 % |
|
| H III 7, 65/6 (11) | 17 % |
|
| E 35404/5 (3) | 15 % |
|
| H II 20, 89/90 (47) | 15 % |
|
| EKmS 4° 2, 779 (94) | 14 % |
|
| H, Peet 106 (117) | 14 % |
|
| EÜS X 774 (39) | 14 % |
|
| EÜS VII 1865 (52) | 13 % |
|
| H II 33, 44 (24) | 12 % |
|
| H II 26, 959 (1) | 12 % |
|
| H II 65, 42 (4) | 11 % |
|
| H III 14, 779 (32) | 11 % |
|
| H I 4, 778 (6) | 11 % |
|
| E 51457 (60) | 10 % |
|
| H II 13, 267 (34) | 10 % |
|