The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
| H II 14, 441 (9) | 52 % |
|
| E 11038 (7) | 47 % |
|
| EKmS 4° 1, 109 (168) | 37 % |
|
| H II 66, 72 (41) | 36 % |
|
| H III 3, 252 (35) | 35 % |
|
| H II 54, 184/5 (80) | 35 % |
|
| H II 21, 420 (6) | 33 % |
|
| H II 14, 7/8 (2) | 32 % |
|
| H II 10, 534 (307) | 31 % |
|
| H II 1, 259 (380) | 30 % |
|
| ERA II 8, 286/7 | 29 % |
|
| H II 54, 469 (166) | 28 % |
|
| H II 15, 415 (53) | 24 % |
|
| H II 7, 695 (22) | 20 % |
|
| E 46282 (21) | 19 % |
|
| H II 18, 837 (6) | 19 % |
|
| H II 2, 661 (817) | 18 % |
|
| EÜS II 996 (154) | 18 % |
|
| H III 5, 429 (1) | 18 % |
|
| H I 4, 171 (30) | 16 % |
|
| E 629 (10) | 16 % |
|
| H II 6, 259/60 (28) | 15 % |
|
| ERA II 9, 324/5 (2) | 14 % |
|
| H II 16, 649/50 (18) | 13 % |
|
| H, Peet 391 (405) | 13 % |
|
| ERA II 255, 267 (2) | 12 % |
|
| H, Peet 61 (64) | 10 % |
|
| E 6828 (1) | 10 % |
|
| EÜS X 1561 (108) | 10 % |
|