The similar poems were computed automatically using an optimized weighted alignment algorithm (Janicki, 2022) on sequences of verses.
| H, R 1, 153 (2) | 23 % |
|
| EKmS 4° 2, 301/2 (7) | 20 % |
|
| H II 26, 451/2 (18) | 19 % |
|
| H I 4, 777 (4) | 19 % |
|
| H, R 1, 211 (9) | 18 % |
|
| H III 15, 265 (2) | 16 % |
|
| H, R 6, 774 (59) | 15 % |
|
| Leoke 5, 109/10 (12) | 14 % |
|
| H II 49, 576 (4) | 14 % |
|
| H II 43, 393/4 (4) | 13 % |
|
| H II 2, 385 (504) | 13 % |
|
| H II 55, 557 (1) | 13 % |
|
| H II 28, 611/2 (12) | 13 % |
|
| H, R 6, 756/7 (41) | 12 % |
|
| EKmS 8° 2, 810/1 (6) | 12 % |
|
| H II 47, 178 (13) | 11 % |
|
| H II 16, 399/400 (1) | 11 % |
|
| H II 25, 244 (29) | 11 % |
|
| E 64244 (3) | 11 % |
|
| EÜS VII 450 (252) | 10 % |
|
| H II 30, 66 (3) | 10 % |
|
| E 56457/8 (3) | 10 % |
|
| E 17514/5 (5) | 10 % |
|
| E 86109/10 (3) | 10 % |
|
| ERA II 147, 13 (1) | 10 % |
|
| ERA II 1, 128 (5) | 10 % |
|
| EÜS V 489/90 (173) | 10 % |
|
| EEA II 11, 59/60 (2) | 10 % |
|
| H II 5, 140/1 (1) | 10 % |
|
| H, Mapp 375/7 | 10 % |
|
| EÜS III 341/3 (41) | 10 % |
|
| H II 53, 591 (40) | 10 % |
|